Book Review: God in the Wasteland

A few weeks ago I read David Wells' book God in the Wasteland. In it, Wells issues a scathing critique of American Christianity and highlights what he views as many areas where we have gone astray. He argues that Christians and their churches have often neglected God--that God has become weightless in the lives of many people within the church today. Wells claims that many people like the idea of being part of a church and of salvation, but that they really give no weight to God in the way they live their daily lives. In many ways, I think that Wells is on to something. He emphasizes the importance of correct theology, but also emphasizes that the theology we claim is so important must also influence the way that we live our lives. If it does not, then we have missed the point.

Wells does not simply limit his critique to individuals though. He also makes a strong case that the Church has gone astray as well. As evidence of this he points to the movement common in American churches of applying the principles of marketing to the administration of the church. We have become very concerned about the desires of the people outside the church, and we seek to tailor our church services in such a way that they will fulfill the desires of non-Christians. Wells argues that essentially, we have made the gospel into a product to be sold rather than a divine imperative. I'm inclined to agree with his assessment.

While it is certainly important for us to be concerned with the way the non-Christian world views the Church, there is some degree to which non-Christians will never feel comfortable inside a church that is truly preaching the gospel. We do not need to be mean-spirited, but we do need to hold out the truth. If we find ourselves hesitant to preach what the Bible says for fear of the backlash of the world, we fail in doing what we are called to do.

I also think that much of the modern emphasis on "worship" experiences stems from this same mentality. I firmly believe that on Sunday mornings we should come together to worship God, but I fear that for many churches that is not what is happening. These church services really fall far short of worship, and are much closer to entertainment. The motivation behind them is not what will please our Heavenly Father, but what the people will enjoy. We need to ask, why do we do the things we do in our church services? Is the music we sing designed to bring glory to God and to draw us into His presence, or is it simply to help us to have a good time? Do we use multimedia in worship because it is an aid to understanding and building community, or do we use it because it's what we have to do to compete with the church down the road? Do we get rid of extended prayer times and Bible readings and shorten the preaching because they are boring and people enjoy other parts of the service more, or do we stand firm that these are essential parts of our worship of God? Do we greet people warmly because it is a way for us to demonstrate the kind of love that Jesus showed, or do we do it because people are more likely to come back if we do?

Don't get me wrong--I think it is ok to sing contemporary music and use multimedia in worship. I think we ought to be welcoming and kind to people who visit our churches. I also don't intend to talk for hours when I preach. But let's not forget the point of Sunday. The point of Sunday is to spend time in worship of God. Our goal should not be to come out of a church service saying, "Wasn't that a lot of fun?" (though worship can be fun!), but to come out saying that you felt like you encountered God--and that as a result, your life should be different.

I don't know that Wells' book would be something that everyone would find valuable or interesting (it's really written more for pastors and church leaders), but I think some of the insights he puts forth are right on target--that if we don't put God and His Word back in the place of prominence in our lives and in our churches, we are destined for trouble.

Trends in Youth Groups

A while ago during my prayer time I was praying for the children of our church and the children of our community. As I was praying, I began to think about my experiences with youth groups and Sunday School classes in the past—both groups that I’d led as well as groups in which I’d participated. I had a startling realization. In many of these groups, when kids who had previously been active and regular attendees of these groups stopped coming, it wasn’t long before those same kids started getting into trouble.

For example, I’ve seen many kids who have stopped participating who I discovered a short time later were involved in alcohol, drugs, and risky premarital sexual activities. Some of these kids have found themselves in jail, others with unintended pregnancies or sexually transmitted diseases, and still others addicted to substances that now control their lives. I don’t know which came first, these dangerous and destructive behaviors or the decision to stop participating in the ministries of the church, but I do know that in my experience the two have often been closely related.

I don’t mean to be alarmist or to point fingers. I do, however, want to make parents aware of a trend that I have seen many times in the past. When we see kids who begin to pull away from the church we need to be asking some serious questions about what really lies behind that decision. We need to talk to them about the activities they are involved in, paying close attention to where they spend their time, with whom, and what they are doing. I continue to pray for the children in our community that they would be spared these kinds of temptations. I hope that you’ll do the same.

Designer God

I was on the Internet the other day looking up some information on someone I saw on television. Admittedly, it was a weak moment of pointless curiosity.

As I was reading the biography the person was quoted as saying, "I am a Christian but I need to say I am not like the kind of Christian you see on television. I don't believe God condemns homosexuality and he is not against Gay marriage . . . my God is not a God of judgment but a God of love."

There are times when I too want to distance myself from television preachers. I understand that concern. However, the statement....."My God is..." is troubling. It gives the impression that we are free to design a God that appeals to us. If you don't like the exclusivity of the Gospel, then you say, "My God would never send anyone to Hell". If you don't like the claims of Jesus you say, "My God reveals Himself through all religions and isn't confined to just one." I you don't like the Bible you say, "My God speaks to me through nature and through my own conscience, I don't need the Bible." Each of these statements sounds spiritual but they avoid the real issue.

The real issue is not how you have designed God, it is who God IS. People may prefer I be handsome, athletic, and able to visit anyone at a moment's notice. However, your preference does not change who I am. It is the same with God. We can imagine Him to be all kinds of things but that does not change who He is.

The Bible is God's Revelation of Himself to those whom He has created. In the Bible God tells us what He is like. He is indeed a God of love. However, because He is loving He is also a God of justice, and justice does require judgment. God has standards. There is a standard of right and wrong. Christian people do not have the option of designing God . . . but they do have the opportunity to know Him in intimate relationship through our Lord Jesus Christ.

The next time someone says to you "My God is . . . ." perhaps you can respond by saying, "I appreciate what you are saying, however I'm less interested in what your god is like and what my god is like. I want to know what the One True and Living God is like. How about if we open the Bible and examine what He has told us about Himself?"

Who "Failed"

Every so often you will hear people bemoan the fact that the church has failed them. In a time of need the church was absent. A family was a part of the church but it didn't help their children who still wandered from the faith. A person came to the church but found that worship did not "meet their needs". The list goes on and on.

Here is a list of my own titled, "Who failed?"

• When a person has a genuine need and communicates that need and the church does nothing, the church has failed.
• When a church tries so hard to be relevant that it softens the message of the Gospel to make it more appealing, the church has failed.
• When all the church income is spent on the maintanence of property, the church has failed.
• When the church refuses to adapt its methods to changing preferences, the church has failed.
• When a church explicitly or implicitly excludes certain people from being welcomed into the church, the church has failed.
• When the church provides youth programs geared toward entertaining youth rather than discipling youth, the church has failed.

But often the church is not the one who has failed,

• When the church provides solid educational programs but people don't take advantage of those opportunities, the people have failed.
• When opportunities for youth are presented but parents choose to "let the kids decide whether or not they will go to Sunday School, youth etc." The parents have failed to lead their children in the way they should go.
• When the church presents a biblical and relevent worship services and the people come to worship distracted, the people have failed to prepare.
• When people agree to serve on committees but fail to show up for meetings, the people have failed the church.
• When people's devotion to the Lord consists only of what they do in church, the people have failed to be true disciples.
• When parents talk about the importance of the Lord but do not reflect that importance in their own priorities, the parents have failed because they are sending a mixed message.
• If people did not care for you in the time of need because they did not know of the need, the people have failed, not the church.
• If the church is willing to adapt to new styles but no one is willing to serve, the church has not failed, the people have failed to serve the Lord through the church.
• If friends and neighbors remain ininformed about the gospel, it is usually not because the church has failed, but because the people have failed.

It seems to me that if focused less on who is to blame for problems and focused more on what we should be doing to solve those problems we would be a much more effective vessel of God's grace.

Intrusion on the Lord's Day

A couple of weeks ago you may have noticed some letters to the editor that were written by Dad. In the course of a single week he and I had heard about several events in the community that were scheduled to be in direct competition with church services and programs on Sundays. We both decided that it was time to act, because the issue of remembering the Sabbath day and keeping it holy is obviously something that is a big deal to God (it's in the ten commandments, after all!) So, we began to write letters and talk to various leaders who were in charge of planning such events. The response, it seems, was that most people had no problem with us declaring that there should not be events scheduled on Sundays. The response that I heard quite often was, "Good for you! I'm glad you're standing up for this."

As I've had a chance to reflect on this issue a little bit more, I came to a realization. Ultimately, we as individual Christians are to blame for the fact that organizers are scheduling events on Sundays. Think about most of the things that are scheduled on Sundays--sports tournaments, fundraisers, practices for various community and school activities. What do all of these things have in common? They are all events that depend on getting a group of people together. Why do organizers schedule events on Sundays? Because it works! Our schedules have gotten incredibly busy, and trying to find a time when a group of people can all get together is difficult. What organizers are finding out is that people are willing to skip church or forgo youth programs in order to attend these events. They schedule events on Sundays because the competition for time is not nearly as fierce--and it's a competition they are often able to win.

Let me pose a question to you--what would happen if everyone who claimed to be a Christian vigorously adhered to the 5th Commandment? How many of the people who attend these events claim to be Christians or part of a church? If we all followed God's command to keep the Sabbath holy there would be very few people who attended these events! If all the Christians stayed home (or went to church), there would be no benefit to scheduling things on Sundays.

Lots of people are glad that Dad and I were willing to take a stand on this issue--but I suspect that most of those people also think it's a pretty self-serving stand. I hope that we all, as Christians, recognize this as a real problem in our society in general and in our community in particular. What we need to understand is that the problem is not just with the people scheduling the events--far too often we send the message that competing with church is not a big deal, because we support these events. So, if you recognize this as a problem let me challenge you to stop being part of the problem, and start being part of the solution. Take a stand, not just with your words, but with your time and your actions. Whether anyone else likes the stand you take or not, God will be pleased by your faithfulness to His commandment.

Speech on Healthcare

Last night the President spoke to the nation about healthcare reform. To be honest, I did not watch the speech. I seldom watch political speeches because I find them long on rhetoric and short on substance. I prefer to read the highlights in the paper.

Overshadowing anything the President had to saw last night was the outburst of "You lie" from one of the Republican congressman. It was a great breach of protocol. The congressman apologized for his lack of civility.

I am leery about a government designed health care program (especially one that does not address tort reform which drives up costs). However, the Bible is clear that we are supposed to show honor to those in authority over us. I think part of this is showing respect for the person speaking, even if you disagree.

I long for the days when Capital hill was characterized by "statesmen". These were people who debated ideas rather than sought to push through agendas. The uncivil comments in the halls of congress reflect what we are seeing in classrooms, workplaces, and even homes: a lack of honor and respect.

As believers we must lead the way in "giving honor to whom honor is due". For any public debate to be beneficial it must first be civil.

Lutherans in trouble

If you have paid attention to the news recently you know that the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA) has decided that those congregations that choose to have practicing homosexuals as Pastors may do so.

A couple of comments on this matter. First, it must be clarified that that are a variety of Lutheran Churches. The ELCA tends to be the most liberal (theologically...meaning they are shakey on what orthodox believers would consider 'essentials') of the Lutheran denominations. The Missouri Synod Lutherans did NOT adopt this decision.

Second, the nature of the decision, as I understand it, is that the ELCA concluded that though some believed the Bible speaks clearly of homosexuality as sin, others do not see it so clearly. So, in a baffling move, they decided that both sides should be embraced as lovers of the truth. Basically, each church is left to make it's own decision. One more step toward making homosexual relationships an accepted part of this denomination.

The reason this is so perplexing is that at its core the church is watering down its belief in the authority of the Word of God to rule our lives. Anyone who reads the Old Testament and New Testament passages on homosexuality will have no trouble understanding what is being taught. Such behavior is condemned as sinful. The church has basically said, "It is OK to change what the Bible teaches to fit your worldview".

This is one step further toward godlessness. When God's Word becomes subject to the whims of men then we have turned things around. God now serves us rather than we serving Him.

The church does not stand against homosexuality because we hate gays. We stand against this behavior and many others because we are FOR people coming into a saving relationship with Jesus Christ. Before that can happen we must turn from our sin. Whitewashing what is sinful is not better than painting over a moldy wall. It may look good for awhile but the problem is not taken care of.

Those who belong to the ELCA have some difficult decisions ahead of them.

Who's On First

Listen to the people around you. You will hear things like:

• Family First
• You have to put the team first
• The good of the country comes before everything
• You have to put the business first
• You have to put your health first
• Your spouse has to come first
• You have to put yourself first

When people say such things people who are standing near them will usually nod in approval at the wisdom of what the person has said. Even if they don't nod they certainly do not question such statements because they sound so noble.

In truth, every one of those statements, if sincere, is sinful. God alone should occupy first place and make first demand on our life. He is the only One who has earned that right. Our family, team, country, business, health, spouse and life will all pass away but the Lord will endure forever. If we have any hope of enduring with Him we must stop pushing Him to the side for trifles and start giving Him the honor He alone deserves.